| Socially Responsible Investment 101 |
|
|
| 24/07/2005 | |
|
Jérôme Tagger, Head of Research at the European Social Investment Forum (Eurosif), answers this week's 101 on socially responsible investment (SRI) 1-What defines a socially responsible investment? Is it fundamentally different from a traditional investment in an equity or fixed income fund? Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) combines investors' financial objectives with their concerns about Environmental, Ethical, Social and Governance (ESG) issues. The reasons why investors decide to invest 'responsibly' may vary from one investor to the next. Where the emphasis is placed on ethics or sustainable development issues, one's approach may be described as value-based, whereas when the primary focus is set on financial return, the usual terminology is shareholder value-based. In most cases, investors find their motivation is a mix of both. Contrary to popular belief, socially responsible investors are not ready to relinquish returns. For many, taking into account ESG issues is an essential part of their risk management process. In that sense, SRI is only different from traditional investment in that it takes a broader view on the scope of investment and its impact on the behaviour of companies invested in. The available investment vehicles (funds or mandates, index or active, equity or fixed income, etc.) are the same for both SRI and traditional investments. 2-What are the most common approaches to SRI, i.e. how can it be performed? Investors may either include ESG criteria as a part of their investment selection process, or use their rights has shareholders to influence company behaviour with regards to ESG issues. Common approaches include:
Additionally, it is important to note that these approaches are not mutually exclusive, but rather complementary as they seek to address ESG issues at different moments in the life cycle of an investment. 3-From an institutional viewpoint, what are the main reasons for investing in a SRI fund or mandate? While institutional investors are generally constrained by fiduciary duty, growing regulations across Europe, particularly for pension funds, encourage them to look at ESG issues. Indeed, their dimension as long-term risks or value drivers is increasingly being recognised by the investment community. This suggests that fiduciary duty could actually require investors to become "responsible" investors. |
|
Articles of the same Serie : 101 |
|
© Copyright 2008 bfinance. This document is for your personal non-commercial use. Any further copying, reproduction, distribution is strictly prohibited. To obtain permission please contact This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it


